Theres nothing wrong with the sql.
You don't need to include an ID at the start of an insert if auto_increment is set. Which from his image it shows it isn't. As i said, i imagine its got something to do with him migrating hosts and not exporting from one database to another while maintaining auto_increment on ids.
My guess is that all tables will have this problem. Not just this one. And that any inserts will fail until he goes through each table and sets auto_increment to be on for each primary key/id field.
But its think the real problem here is that the questions and answers are being lost in translation